Back to Home Page | Back to Index |
"ISSUES OF DISTINCTION" The Existence Of God I. THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS ISSUE A. IF GOD DOES NOT EXIST... 1. Then atheists and agnostics are on the side of TRUTH 2. Then there is no Supreme Being to which we must give an account a. I.e., no Judgment Day b. I.e., no heaven or hell 3. There is no reason to be accountable to anyone but ourselves 4. There is no right or wrong, no good or evil 5. We would best live by the saying: "Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die" B. BUT IF GOD DOES EXIST... 1. Then there is a Supreme Being to Whom we must give an account 2. We owe to ourselves to learn whatever we can... a. About the NATURE of this God b. About what He may REQUIRE of us 3. Such a search for knowledge concerning this God may be life-long, but if there is a God, then it is worth it! - cf. Jer 9:23-24 [In any issue of controversy, the burden of proof rests upon those who argue in the affirmative; so what are the EVIDENCES presented by those who affirm that God exists?] II. EVIDENCES FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD A. THE "ONTOLOGICAL" ARGUMENT... 1. This argument was espoused by Anselm, a theologian and philosopher, also the archbishop of Cantebury (ca. 1100 A.D.) a. It runs something like this: "If man can have the concept of a perfect God, then He must exist" b. It is based upon the premise that everything man can know or think is based upon some reality (though often perverted) 2. "This is probably one of the weakest of the philosophical arguments; and to many this argument is somewhat unconvincing." (J. D. Thomas, Facts & Faith) B. THE "GENERAL" ARGUMENT... 1. This argument is based upon "the universal belief in God and the religious instinct" a. "Men in all the world, and throughout all time, not only believe in deity, but also engage in acts of worship and devotion." - cf. Ac 17:26-27 b. "The religious principle is extremely potent in all nations, dominating their thought and history." c. "Everywhere the human heart has a craving for God. There will be exceptions as individuals, but the exceptions do not invalidate the rule. The atheist is an exception in every society!" (Ferrell Jenkins, Introduction To Christian Evidences) 2. This argument reasons in this way: a. Since there is in the universe those things that satisfy man's deepest longings... b. ...there must be a reality (i.e., God) that complements and meets this universal craving for a Supreme Being C. THE "COSMOLOGICAL" ARGUMENT... 1. This is also called "the argument from first cause" a. It is based upon the premise "every effect must have a cause" b. The cosmos (universe) is an effect that has adequate cause c. The theist believes that Gen 1:1 reveals that adequate cause: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." 2. A common objection is often raised: "Who created God?" a. It is important to bear in mind that the law which states every effect has a cause applies to things that are "physical" b. God by definition is not physical, and therefore not bound by laws which we may discern to apply to physical things 1) God is a spiritual being - cf. Jn 4:24 2) His omnipresence is but one example of how He defies laws of nature - cf. Jer 23:23-24 c. So the argument does not apply to Him, and He becomes the "uncaused cause" of all things! D. THE "TELEOLOGICAL" ARGUMENT... 1. This argument is based upon the evidence of design in the universe 2. Evidence of design suggests a "designer", some Being with intelligence possessing purpose a. E.g., a watch shows design, and implies a watchmaker b. To credit such intricate and precise workmanship to blind chance is unreasonable 3. Examples of design in the universe are many; some examples... a. Orderly movement of heavenly bodies, making space travel possible b. Animal instinct, such as the migration patterns of birds, eels, and salmon c. The human body itself, e.g., the eye 4. Contemplating upon the universe and the human body rightfully produces awe, and points man to his Creator - cf. Ps 19:1-2; 139:14; Ro 1:19-20 E. THE "MORAL" ARGUMENT... 1. This is also called the "anthropological argument" 2. It is based upon reality that everywhere people have "a sense of ought" a. That in certain circumstances, certain things should be done b. People are concerned... 1) That people should act a certain way 2) That people do not often act the way they should c. Even atheists and agnostics have "a sense of justice", and are angered when it is violated (as in the case of rape and murder) 3. This moral nature in man demands a Moral Being as the Original Cause F. THE "ESTHETICAL" ARGUMENT... 1. This argument is based upon the presence of beauty and sublimity in the universe 2. It observes that you have both... a. The presence of beauty in nature itself, and in art produced by man b. The response of man to such beauty 3. How did this "beauty", and the "ability to appreciate" it, develop? a. Were both the result of blind chance? b. Or did it come from a Supreme Being, who is not only... 1) Intelligent (an argument from design) 2) Moral (an argument from our sense of ought) ...but also Artistic (an argument from beauty and our sense of it)? - cf. Ps 96:4-6 CONCLUSION 1. These arguments we have considered are "philosophical arguments", but they are based upon what the Bible itself says can be learned about God from nature - cf. Ps 19:1-2; Ro 1:20 2. The arguments we have considered are some of the reasons why so many believe in the existence of God, be they Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Moslems, Christians, etc. 3. Other arguments can be offered to support the existence of God... a. Fulfilled prophecies in the Scriptures b. Scientific foreknowledge of the Scriptures c. Uniformity of the Scriptures d. Evidences for the resurrection of Jesus from the dead -- But these arguments we shall consider as we examine other "Issues Of Distinction" But Who is this Supreme Being? In our next study, we shall take a look at "The Identity Of God"...
－－《Executable Outlines》